“There is a little caveat in the constitution which provides for legitimate suppression of this freedom (people’s freedom to uphold their opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference) where free speech may interfere with the interests of say defense, public safety, public order, the economic interests of the State, public morality or public health. That just about covers everything any would be activist might wish to touch upon. It is a broad enough caveat, with all those old imperialists hiding behind the churu (ant hills), for any would-be law-enforcer to stifle the thoughts and expressions of any activist!” ANDREW FIELD.
Follow the link to read more. http://justandrewinzimbabwe.wordpress.com/2011/12/18/the-social-media-threat-myth-or-revolution/